Staging
v0.8.1
https://github.com/python/cpython
Revision 7c2a85b2d44851c2442ade579b760f86447bf848 authored by Tim Peters on 31 August 2004, 02:19:55 UTC, committed by Tim Peters on 31 August 2004, 02:19:55 UTC
ldexp.  Both methods are exact, and return the same results.  Turns out
multiplication is a few (but just a few) percent faster on my box.
They're both significantly faster than using struct with a Q format
to convert bytes to a 64-bit long (struct.unpack() appears to lose due
to the tuple creation/teardown overhead), and calling _hexlify is
significantly faster than doing bytes.encode('hex').  So we appear to
have hit a local minimum (wrt speed) here.
1 parent 3fa19d7
History
Tip revision: 7c2a85b2d44851c2442ade579b760f86447bf848 authored by Tim Peters on 31 August 2004, 02:19:55 UTC
HardwareRandom: Go back to multiplying by 2**-BPF instead of using
Tip revision: 7c2a85b
File Mode Size
.cvsignore -rw-r--r-- 31 bytes
Grammar -rw-r--r-- 4.9 KB

back to top